🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."