🔗 Share this article

For Natalia Molina and longtime Mexican American, the most memorable moment of the baseball championship didn't occur during the tense finale on Saturday, when her squad pulled off one dramatic comeback act after another before prevailing in extra innings over the Toronto Blue Jays.

It came in the previous game, when two supporting athletes, the Puerto Rican player and the Venezuelan infielder, pulled off a thrilling, decisive sequence that at the same time challenged many harmful misconceptions touted about Hispanic people in the past decades.

The play itself was stunning: the outfielder raced in from the outfield to snag a ball he at first misjudged in the bright lights, then fired it to the infield to record another, decisive out. the second baseman, positioned nearby, received the ball just a split second before a runner collided with him, knocking him backwards.

This was not just a remarkable athletic achievement, possibly the decisive shift in the series in the Dodgers' direction after appearing for most of the games like the weaker side. To her, it was exhilarating, politically and culturally, a badly needed morale boost for Latinos and for Los Angeles after a period of enforcement actions, security forces patrolling the neighborhoods, and a steady drumbeat of criticism from official sources.

"Kike and Miggy put forth this alternative story," explained the professor. "The world saw Latinos showing an infectious pride and joy in what they do, being key figures on the team, having a different kind of confidence. They're bombastic, they're yelling, they're removing their shirts."

"It was such a juxtaposition with what we observe on the news – raids, Latinos detained and pursued. It's so simple to be demoralized these days."

However, it's exactly simple to be a Dodgers fan nowadays – for Molina or for the many of other Latinos who attend regularly to home games and fill up as many as 50% of the stadium's 50,000 spots per game.

The Mixed Connection with the Organization

After aggressive enforcement operations began in Los Angeles in early June, and military units were deployed into the city to respond to resulting protests, two of the local sports clubs promptly released statements of support with affected communities – but not the Dodgers.

The team president has said the Dodgers prefer to steer clear of politics – a view colored, perhaps, by the fact that a significant minority of the supporters, including some Hispanic fans, are supporters of certain leaders. Under significant public pressure, the team later committed $one million in support for families directly affected by the operations but made no official condemnation of the administration.

White House Event and Historical Heritage

Three months before, the organization did not hesitate in agreeing to an invitation to mark their previous World Series victory at the White House – a decision that sports columnists described as "pathetic … weak … and contradictory", considering the team's pride in having been the first professional franchise to end the color barrier in the 1940s and the frequent references of that history and the principles it represents by officials and current and former players. A number of players such as the manager had expressed unwillingness to go to the White House during the initial period but either reconsidered or succumbed to pressure from team management.

Business Ownership and Fan Conflicts

A further issue for supporters is that the Dodgers are controlled by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose investments, according to sources and its own published balance sheets, involve a share in a private prison corporation that operates detention centers. The group's leadership has said repeatedly that it aims to remain neutral of politics, but its detractors say the silence – and the investment – are their own form of compliance to current policies.

All of that contribute to significant mixed feelings among Hispanic supporters in particular – sentiments that emerged even in the euphoria of this year's hard-won championship triumph and the following explosion of team support across the city.

"Can one to root for the team?" local columnist Erick Galindo agonized at the beginning of the postseason in an elegant essay pondering on "Dodger blue in our veins, but doubt in our minds". He couldn't finally bring himself to view the championship, but he still felt deeply, to the extent that he believed his one-man boycott must have given the team the luck it required to win.

Separating the Team from the Owners

Many fans who have Galindo's misgivings appear to have concluded that they can continue to back the players and its roster of global players, including the Asian megastar Shohei Ohtani, while expressing disdain on the organization's corporate leadership. Nowhere was this more evident than at the championship parade at Dodger Stadium on the following day, when the capacity crowd cheered in approval of the coach and his players but jeered the executive and the chief executive of the ownership group.

"These men in formal attire don't get to claim our boys in blue from us," Molina said. "We have been with the team for more time than they have."

Past Background and Neighborhood Effect

The problem, however, goes further than just the organization's current owners. The deal that brought the former franchise to the city in the 1950s involved the municipality demolishing three working-class Latino communities on a elevated area above downtown and then transferring the land to the team for a small part of its actual worth. A track on a 2005 album that chronicles the story has an impoverished parking attendant at the venue revealing that the house he forfeited to eviction is now a part of the field.

Gustavo Arellano, possibly the region's most widely followed Mexican American columnist and broadcaster, sees a darker side to the long, dysfunctional dynamic between the team and its fanbase. He calls the team the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of baseball, "a business organization with an excessive, even harmful following by too many Latinos" that has been shortchanging its supporters for years.

"They've put one arm around Hispanic fans while profiting from them with the other for so long because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer wrote over the summer, when calls to boycott the team over its absence of response to the enforcement actions were contradicted by the uncomfortable reality that turnout at home games did not dip, even at the peak of the protests when the city center was subject to a nightly curfew.

International Players and Community Bonds

Distinguishing the team from its business leadership is not a simple task, {